NFL Week 5 Picks
Friday, October 9, 2009 21:00NFL WEEK 5 PICKS AND ANALYSIS
I was rereading my week four drivel and was really impressed with how astute, knowledgeable, and confident my words were. I’d like to believe I know what I’m talking about.
I’d also like to believe Eva Longoria thinks I’m hot.
Obviously, I was abducted by lizard-like inner earth beings and was, for NFL week four, anyway, impersonated by some creature who had his head so far up his ass he could snort coke off his spleen.
Here’s what this imposter wrote about the Oakland/Houston game played in the great state of Texas:
Take Oakland and the 9.5 points. Houston couldn’t stop the run in a discarded pair of nylons. Look for Daren McFadden to have a breakout game and the Raiders to score at least three touchdowns. Of course, that can happen only if JaMarcus Russell throws the ball better than my grandma, who has been dead for 30 years. I’m betting J-Marc can–Grandma always had bad mechanics.
Final score Texans 29 – Raidas 6. Grandma vindicated.
Loyal readers–if I have any left–have probably already noticed I write these weekly pick columns without my friend and black-sheep cousin of Michele Nostradamus, Murray Dunnosquattis. Murray and I had a falling out after he predicted Brett Favre would end up in Minnesota, the Titans would lose their first four tilts of the season, and the Steelers would squander two, almost three late leads because their defense couldn’t make a third down stop in the fourth quarter.
Murray is obviously delusional–and needs mass quantities of Thorazine.
Your humble columnist may need a similar prescription if he has any more 3-11 weeks picking against the Vegas line.
I LOVE RAY LEWIS
Four words I never thought I’d write.
Mr. Lewis joins Jack Lambert in my pantheon of favorite players who call quarterbacks and league honchos out for flagging defenders for cheap roughing calls–because they fall into, near, or around “elite” QBs dainty little legs–or on DBs who blast their shoulder pads into a wide receiver’s chest.
Tom Brady? If you want to know what a vagina looks like in a football helmet, check out Tommy Girl on this week’s highlight shows.
Before my legion of female readers decry my use of their collective genitals for descriptive purposes…I’m sorry, ladies, but you know what they say:
“If the Tampon fits…”
In fairness to Roger Goodell and the NFL brainless trust, I understand why they don’t want their highest paid, and most important players vulnerable to late hits. I totally agree the concern for quarterbacks is legitimate, but the NFL has to temper its zeal to protect the quarterback and “defenseless receivers.”
Is it unreasonable to ask that refs enforce the rules with some kind of common sense?
In neither roughing penalty against the Black Birds was there even a semblance of intent by the Baltimore player. The “blow to the head” was more like a brush of a finger. Little Tommy threw a fit when a Raven fell into him and nicked his fragile legs. He pouted for a flag; the ref threw one.
It is not fair to the game or to the defenders who are busting their nuts to make a play. “He’s a man…” Mr. Lewis, referring to Brady, reminded Roger and the fans. I love you Ray, but maybe that’s just wishful thinking.
The most egregious flag of the weekend was thrown on KC’s Jarrod Paige for an absolute textbook tackle on Giant’s receiver, Steve Smith. If I’m Todd Haley, I tell my player, I’m paying that fine and everyone you get for a shoulder to the chest hit. It was a beautifully executed tackle.
If the NFL wants to stop helmet-to-helmet contact, they should ban helmets. Instead they spend millions of dollars to research how to make helmets more protective. Until that ends, players will use their heads to tackle. Jarrad Page did not use his head and he still got flagged.
I bet if he were Troy Polamalu, or Ed Reed, that flag stays in the refs’ pocket.
And the pussification of American football continues…
TOEING THE LINE
With the horrific 3-11 tally for week 4, The Gairzo is sucking quicksand at 30 – 32 for the season. Let’s see if he can turn around in a week five brimming with great match-ups.
First of all, let’s lay it on the table; there are some terrible teams in the NFL. Detroit and Oakland will be paying for a decade of bad draft picks and too many high round busts for at least a few more years. Kansas City and Tampa Bay are young and play in the purgatory from which the 49ers extricated themselves with the miracles St. Mike of Chicago has worked. Cleveland, Cincinnati and Buffalo have given the impression they are about to turn the corner only to run into a brick wall built by bad development, ineffective coaching, lack of discipline, and plain bad luck. The Rams reflect the directionless turmoil their owners wallow in.
There are common threads to building consistently successful football teams. The formula for success is obvious. What do New York, Philadelphia, Indy, New Orleans, Pittsburgh, Green Bay, and the Pats have in common? Ownership hired a young coach, predominantly from the defensive side of the ball, then went sailing, golfing, or poloing, or whatever filthy rich people do–and left football to the people who know the game.
Look at the improvement by teams like the Niners, Saints, Bengals, and Da Bears. Their owners have stuck with their head coaches through down times, like the Rooneys did with Cowher and the Titans have with Fisher. Ken Whisenhut in Arizona has to deal with a young, over-achieving team that got hot last year but won’t be sneaking up on anyone in ‘09. We shall see if the Bidwells learned the lesson.
Conversely, look at awful teams like the Lions, Browns, Rams, and Oakland. More often than not, teams suck over a long period because ego-driven owners think they know best. The Dallas Cowboys, on paper, are the most talented football team on the planet. They have it all–the biggest and best stadium, practice facilities, and cheerleaders’ plastic surgeons. Dallas is also where desperate coaches voluntarily stuff themselves into the human meat grinder known as Jerry Jones. I wish Mister Jones all the luck in the world and I hope he continues believing his sweet delusion. I’d love nothing more than to see another 13 years pass without a Dallas play-off victory.
THE WEEKLY TRIFECTA
I’m taking credit for last week’s suckers bet even though I picked Green Bay. Remember, that pick is my bet to stay away from. In the event of a blowout or a very lopsided score and I pick the wrong team, I’ll take the loss. Otherwise, I reserve the right to pad my Trifecta stats-which now stand at 9-12.
THE UPSET OF THE WEEK
The Bengals may be ready to tear down their brick wall this year, and, as predicted, the Ravens’ defense has regressed a couple of notches. Look for Carson Palmer to out-duel Flacco in a shootout. With the Cats getting 8.5 points, this is a pretty safe bet.
THE LOCK OF THE WEEK
If the Steelers can’t whip Detroit by two touchdowns, something is very, very, wrong in the sports world. A Detroit team that has shown signs of competitive life this year will be without promising QB Matthew Stafford and wide-out Calvin Johnson. Bet the house, cars, children, and dog.
THE SUCKERS BET OF THE WEEK
The Bronos are out to prove they are for real. Rumor has it Tom Brady will play in a tutu. Either way New England is an elite team and the Broncs want to be. This one will be close and may take a mile-high field goal to decide. Don’t miss it–and don’t bet on it.
As always, the weekly lines I use are found here: http://www.footballlocks.com/nfl_lines.shtml
My picks are in bold italics below:
NFL Lines For Week 5 – 10/11 – 10/12, 2009
| Date & Time | Favorite | Line | Underdog | Total |
| 10/11 1:00 ET | Minnesota | -10 | At St. Louis | 41 |
| 10/11 1:00 ET | Dallas | -8.5 | At Kansas City | 42.5 |
| 10/11 1:00 ET | At Carolina | -3.5 | Washington | 37.5 |
| 10/11 1:00 ET | At Philadelphia | -15 | Tampa Bay | 43 |
| 10/11 1:00 ET | At NY Giants | -15.5 | Oakland | 38 |
| 10/11 1:00 ET | At Buffalo | -6 | Cleveland | 40.5 |
| 10/11 1:00 ET | At Baltimore | -8.5 | Cincinnati | 42 |
| 10/11 1:00 ET | Pittsburgh | -10.5 | At Detroit | 44 |
| 10/11 4:05 ET | At San Francisco | -2.5 | Atlanta | 41 |
| 10/11 4:15 ET | New England | -3 | At Denver | 41 |
| 10/11 4:15 ET | At Arizona | -5.5 | Houston | 49.5 |
| 10/11 4:15 ET | At Seattle | -1 | Jacksonville | Off |
| 10/11 8:20 ET | Indianapolis | -3.5 | At Tennessee | 46 |
Monday Night Football Line
| 10/12 8:35 ET | NY Jets | -2 | At Miami | 36 |
Bye Weeks: Chicago, Green Bay, New Orleans, San Diego












Gairzo
says:
October 10th, 2009 at 8:30 am
For the cosmic record–and because my number is 75%–my Trifecta record for the quarter pole of the season is 9 correct picks out of 12
Nate Barlow
says:
October 10th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Players at every position on every team lobby for penalty flags, whether legitimate or not; singling out one for doing so is petty. It's completely fair though to blame the refs for giving them and the league rules for encouraging the refs to throw them. As far as I'm concerned, poor Ray Lewis gets the only tampon for being a whiny little bitch pouting over how his vaunted Ravens' defense got exposed. I hope other teams study the footage from the Patriots game and exploit their vulnerabilities for the rest of the season. Of course, that'll take a team tough enough and smart enough to do so.
Gairzo
says:
October 10th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
True, a lot of players lobby for a flag, but when any objective fan sees a James Harrison or Albert Haynesworth getting choke held on every play without getting a flag; when fans see a Brees or Palmer getting accidentally hand-slapped or hit low by receivers blocked or falling into them–and then see Tommy Girl get the call on a very similar questionable hit, at best, it reflects poorly on the integrity of the league and the game.
These men make what 10-12 million a year to quarterback? There are going to be 350 pound men out to crush you on every play. Sometimes, they are going to fall, trip, stumble, or be blocked into you. Sometimes, when jumping or reaching to slap down a pass they are going to inadvertently contact your helmet. The laws of inertia say it is impossible to stop bodies in motion the way the league thinks they should.
It is not petty to call Brady a vag. It was terrible the way he and Palmer were injured, but neither injury was intentionally inflicted and the NFL's response to those incidents is unfair to defenses and compromises the game's integrity. I think the Pats have a prima donna attitude about them or still resent they were caught red-handed cheating. Either way, they ain't getting no break from me. I'm never petty. Passionate, biased, intense, unrelenting–perhaps. A Patsie hater and NFL media gadfly–hell yes!
Your misguided analysis of the issue has sparked a great idea, Nate…How 'bout an award–The Golden Tampon…THE TAMPY–presented each week from a list of NFL players submitted by DIS writers and readers.
So far we have two nominees: Marsha-er, Tom Brady, for begging for a flag after inadvertent contact and Ray Lewis for whing like a biatch after his birdies were exposed by the Pats.
From our readers——any other nominees?
Nate Barlow
says:
October 10th, 2009 at 8:38 pm
It absolutely reflects badly on the League that they don't call it the same way regardless of the player in question. I don't care that you call Brady a vag as long as as you call every other player asking for the flag the same thing. If one is, they all are. If you're singling out one player for something countless others do, you're being petty (or biased, if you prefer)
Blame the refs for the inconsistent calling, but its the League's and refs' fault for the inconsistency, not the players/teams.
I do like The Golden Tampon!
Gairzo
says:
October 10th, 2009 at 9:57 pm
Dude, Brady acts like he's entitled to special treatment because he got injured. That ain't biased or petty. Look at how he acts. A lot of pundits on the studio shows have compared the calls Brady and Manning types get as opposed to young guys like Shaun Hill or Matt Ryan–and even Big Ben types who extend plays to the limit.
The over-arching point of the column was to highlight the NFL's disturbing proclivity to legislate the violence out of the game only when it comes to prima donna quarterbacks. Again, I'm all in favor of protecting the top line talents like Brady and Manning, and quarterbacks in general–but I don't see the league protecting kick returners who are held up and mauled until they give up the ball. I don't see the league enforcing the rules for defenders who win their one-on-one match-ups only to be deprived of a sack because of blatant holding or worse.
Last year, Hines Ward got lucky and got a blind-side block on Keith Rivers, the league reacts with a rule the play itself wasn't about. No replay I've seen shows Ward's helmet being the culprit of the play. He caught a linebacker in hot pursuit who had no clue he was about to be smashed. Ward blasted into Rivers with his pads and evidently caught his chin strap. THAT'S FOOTBALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
These men are paid so much, saps like me are required to pay 200.00/yr. to watch them play. I watch because I admire the teamwork, precision, desire, and talent. I also love the violence. At least I admit it.
When you have a league that uses its "Greatest Hits" CD to glorify violence legislating the violence out of the game–while allowing pass rushers to be choked on every play– you disrespect the game and the defense.
I hate Baltimore. Their getting jobbed by the refs helped the Steelers. You gotta be fair. Neither play demonstrated a defender's effort to injure or do Brady wrong. At that level, with that much humanity smashing into itself, people are gonna twist, turn, fall, and fly into a QB.
It is fair to penalize defenders for being out of control when they should be or can be in control–it is patently unfair to penalize them when they can't possibly be in control.
Nate Barlow
says:
October 10th, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Read what I said. I never said the penalties in the Baltimore-New England were right or fair. I never said that the NFL is not hypocritical for putting out Greatest Hits discs while punishing the very violence being glorified. I never said that the application of the rules is fair. And I never said that that these rules should be in the game as they are now–there needs to be a balance between protection and clean hard hits, and that protection belongs for everybody. Clean, unintended hits should be penalized
I agree with you on all those points.
All I said is if you're going to call out one player for looking for an unwarranted flag, call all out the players doing so. It happens all the time. Anything else is being as unfair as the refs are in selectively dishing out the flags. That's cheap and biased. And blame the refs for throwing them, since ultimately the decision resides on them, not the players lobbying. Players will continue to look for the unfair flag as long as refs throw them–after all, it helps their team.
Gairzo
says:
October 10th, 2009 at 10:50 pm
Point taken. We'll blame the refs and the league.
We need some other readers/contributors to break our deadlock for the first DIS Golden Tampon Award. I vote for Brady, anyway, because he's Brad–and married to a super model.
I take it you still vote for Ray-Ray?
C'mon people …cast your vote….
Who gets the first DIS TAMPY AWARD for vaginal behavior on the gridiron?
Nate Barlow
says:
October 11th, 2009 at 2:23 am
Definitely Lewis for me. I think he's sore their perfect start is open and that the defense was exposed. I only saw a few minutes of the game–the Brady sack-fumble-touchdown recovery by the Ravens followed by Brady subsequently picking apart the Ravens D like he was facing a college team or, I don't know, the Raiders.