The Hate List: 4/29/09 – My Top Two Most Hated Sports Teams
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 12:27The top two teams on my hate list do not even play in the NFL…
FULL DISCLOSURE: I spent eight years as a student of Our Lady of Fatima Elementary School and Home for Sexually Frustrated Women in Penguin Costumes. My mission while I was there was to torture nuns. Their mission was to beat me. Neither party failed to meet their objective.
The reason for this disclosure makes a modicum of sense when you learn the runner-up on my personal Hate List is…
THE NOTRE DAME FIGHTING IRISH
Where do I begin?
Every year, it’s the same ol’ story: Notre Dame has one of the top ten recruiting classes, then they gag in a big game or three and end up sucking. They often lose one or two blue-chippers a year because the recruits cannot hack the “stringent academic standards Notre Dame demands of its students.”
What’s the word I’m looking for? Sheep__?… No… Alpaca__?… No…
BULLS#$@!
Given the advantages the Irish enjoy—NBC contract, weekly television, football conference independence—they should win a national championship every year. When Notre Dame manages to win 6–7 games a year they are awarded a second tier bowl game, thereby, often screwing a much more deserving, smaller conference team out of a big payday. There was a time Fighting Irish refused to go to a second-rate bowl game
Watching Notre Dame lose is about as spiritually uplifting as sports allows a heathen like me to be.
You might be asking, “…but Gairzo, why would a nice Catholic boy like you be a hater of the most revered Catholic institution in America?” The answer—besides the fact this topic provides me the perfect passive aggressive way to avenge the Evil Sister Euphemia’s sadistic tendencies—is, in a word…
HYPOCRISY
In 2001, the Fighting Irish hired George O’Leary as the Domer’s head football coach. He had very recently turned around the Georgia Tech program. O’Leary resigned five days later because, as a young guy, he padded his resume. Okay, I can understand the need to maintain the illusion of integrity. But, I would have also fired the AD for not vetting his candidates more closely.
Then, Notre Dame shocks the world and hires Tyrone Willingham who had made Stanford football, yes, Stanford, respectable. They give TW, an African-American, a five-year contract. The “shock” comes from Mr. Willingham’s race; given the fact the school had never even interviewed a black individual for the head coaching position. His hiring was supposed to demonstrate Notre Dame had evolved from a lily-white institution into a progressive bastion of diversity—even though the deepest rumblings of dissent came from the school’s nation-wide and predominantly white legion of fans.
After winning ten games in his first campaign, Willingham was fired after two mediocre campaigns; his record was 21-15.
First year hires get five years to fail—at most universities. Makes sense, because college football coaches can’t field a team of “their kids” until after they recruit four years. Willingham got three. Even if we give the Notre Dame brass the benefit of the doubt, and not blame the Willingham debacle on racism, the facts say Willingham is the only ND football coach since Hugh Devore in 1945 not to be given at least 5 years at the helm. Willingham was the first African-American to coach any Notre Dame sports team—and the only one to this day.
For an in depth statistical analysis of ND’s hypocrisy regarding Mr. Willingham, read this commentary from Jon Wilner:
But, wait, my dearies, there is so much more…
THE CATHOLIC THING
Sorry, but you can’t boast about being a great Catholic University when altar boys are getting fondled under tabernacles across America. In fact, you might want to come out and support the victims of systemic pedophilia in some kind of public way.
You want the status of higher education pre-eminence in the Catholic universe? Donate a home game’s receipts to help kids whom your clergymen have scarred for life.
FIGHTING IRISH
I had the distinct pleasure of seeing my Irish neighbor, Tommy McLean’s, naturally red-faced head almost implode when I asked, “Hey Tommy, would you still root for Notre Dame if they were called the Passive Bulgarians?”
Seriously, the name “Fighting Irish” comes from the stereotypes of drunken Irish fighting while drinking. Even if you buy competing theories of the name being based on the famous Civil War brigade, perception does count. Calling a team the Fighting Irish is still the equivalent of say… The Baltimore Dumb Pollacks, The LaJolla Shining Wet Backs, or the California Bad Driving Asians.
Of course, one very possible side-effect of calling your team “The Fighting Irish”—the moniker could potentially embolden Irish Catholics who like to drink—and haven’t been to church in decades—to well, fight, at the drop of a penalty flag.
TOUCHDOWN JESUS
As opposed to a term like “The Immaculate Reception”, which cleverly describes a football play that seemed to have come about as a result of divine intervention, Touchdown Jesus is a mural of the Risen Savior looming above Notre Dame’s football stadium.
A few years back, I went to the annual ND spring game with my neighbor—he almost came to tears when he referenced Touchdown Jesus. I am not kidding; the man was about to weep.
Like many Irish fans, Tommy insists Jesus is signaling a touchdown.
I’m kind of thinking that’s not what the artist was going for.
BLUE JERSEYS
Talk about annoying. Please, if you nickname your football team with a negative ethnic stereotype have the decency to get the friggin’ color scheme right! I know the Irish have, on occasion, worn green jerseys, but the official team colors are blue and gold. And, no, I don’t care what those colors symbolize in Catholic mythology; if you call yourselves the Fighting Irish you are required to wear green—Kelly green.
Imagine the Red Sox wearing gold leggings… the Duke Blue Devils in orange shorts… The Raidas in pink jerseys…
WHAT THE F%#K!!?
The only other sports team that boils my plasma more than the Notre Dame Fighting Irish, the team destined to always be number one with a hollow point bullet on my Hate List is…
THE NEW YORK YANKEES
This sports franchise represents all that is, has been, and forever will be wrong in American professional sports. Their corporate greed is the perfect American example of capitalism’s limitations as an economic structure.
GREED IS NOT GOOD
Before you assault my editor with vicious e-mails, and, please, feel free to do so, I do not begrudge great players—those who consistently average .300, smack 40 homers and/or 175 hits a year–the top money in their sport.
However, the Steinbrenners have single-handedly ruined baseball for a significant number of fans of less financially gifted franchises.
They are paying A.J. Burnett 13.2 million. By any measure of modern day statistical standards Burnett is barely a spider’s eyelash above average: 88-76 with a career ERA of 3.81. He also, conveniently, puts up his bigger numbers only when a new contract is at stake.
Hideki Matsui, 35 year-old designated hitter. Doesn’t even play the field: 13,000,000.00. Johnny Damon—terrible fielder, slightly above average hitter: 13,000,000.00.
And that ain’t all…
Forget the Stanks pay over the hill players obscene money. They even overpay the great players of the game. A-Roid—admitted, tiny-balled, steroids user—27,000,000.00. Let me write that out because I didn’t believe it when I verified the figure: twenty-seven million dollars!!!!
No athlete who has ever lived can justify earning that money.
However, if by yanking that kind of money from the Steinbrenners, A-Roid and his ilk hasten the team’s financial demise, then I hope Hank and the Boys suffocate between their own deep pockets
For all you Yankee fans out there, I know you are cursing. It ain’t my money, I’m from Pittsburgh, and that alone means I know nothing about winning baseball. No arguments here. The Pirates have sucked for so long Linda Lovelace has a lawsuit pending against them for copyright infringement. I also admit to a certain jealousy of nearly always seeing the Wankees making the post-season—but it’s way beyond petty jealousy.
Just like Neuter Dame, the Skanks have enjoyed certain advantages since the light bulb flashed over Abner Doubleday’s head.
The concentration of population in the New York Metro area gave the team once called the Highlanders the same economic advantages today’s Yankees enjoy. New York has always been able to pay the most to the best players just as they can today.
So, every time I hear Billy Crystal or some other smarmy Yankee fans drone on about how flies flutter like ballerinas around their hot dogs excuse me if I roll my eyes.
Don’t blame me if syrupy memories of the day Joe DiMaggio screwed Marilyn in centerfield, or the bonding a little boy enjoyed with his dad and a hooker on a steamy July afternoon makes me want to chug some ipecac syrup and give their remembrance a good taste of reality.
You know what, Billy? Nobody gives a damn. Not everybody thinks the Yankees have been fair to the game or to other teams in baseball. People in Kansas City and Minnesota, and Milwaukee have memories, too.
And, yes, Yankee lovers, I know. I could blame the four or five other teams who, along with the Yankees, relegate the rest of MLB to the ranks of a farm system—the Mets, Red Sox, Dodgers, and Cubs, but what fun would that be?
Besides, the Mets have no choice, as they are cross-town rivals in New York. Red Sox fans hate the Yanks worse than I ever can, the Dodgers high-tailed it out of New York, and the Cubbies are named after cute little baby bears. All legit reasons to like them and direct all my pent-up hate at the truly, and only, evil New York team.
Admittedly, there are smaller market teams that have found success in recent years but their long-term performances cannot and never will equal that of the Hankees. And, I am not blaming the Pinstripers for the utter failures of perennially poorly managed clubs like the Pirates and Royals.
I hate the Yankees because when they pay mediocre players huge money, the market skews unfairly and inexorably to them and the handful of teams who can, at least initially compete with the Steinbrenners.
To hell with the Yankees!
So tell us, who do you hate?
I am shocked that no Steeler haters have yet written in to excoriate your humble columnist and to disrespectfully refer to the only six—let me repeat—only six-time Super Bowl Champions as the Pittsburgh Squealers.
Where’s the Hate?
Next month: The Lighter Side of Hate…
11 Responses to “The Hate List: 4/29/09 – My Top Two Most Hated Sports Teams”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.












Bill Cruncher
says:
April 29th, 2009 at 10:58 pm
Tyrone Willingham is a bad coach . All this racial stuff is total crap and those who have been around the programs he's coached at, know the truth.
Not only was he a terrible coach, he was a lazy recruiter, he alienated the fans, alienated the boosters, and was an insecure control freak.
Before you bring up the race card in regards to TW, do a little homework. Tyrone did more damage off the field in his last two jobs than he did on the field. And on the field wasn't so hot. Again, do a little homework before playing the race card
Nate Barlow
says:
April 30th, 2009 at 1:26 am
I agree with you about the race card. I'm always suspicious of it; too often an easy excuse to avoid the real facts.
That having been said, I've always though Willingham did not receive a fair shake, all the more so considering how terrible Charlie Weiss's tenure has been for the Irish–and yet he's still coaching! Definitely something beyond that which occurred on the field of play came into ND's consideration.
Nate Barlow
says:
April 30th, 2009 at 1:36 am
I am absolutely, 100% in agreement about the New York Yankees… but then I am a Red Sox fan, so it has been bred into me since the day of my birth. I feel very fortunate that the Red Sox are one of the few teams financially capable of keeping up with the Yanks, but I sincerely wish all of MLB was on a more even playing monetary playing field. Even if the Sox could not keep up, I would be glad that at least some teams would be able to compete with New York in terms of payroll. I do think that while those five other high-payroll teams would still spend more than the rest of the teams even without being pushed by the Yankees, the degree to which they currently do is largely driven by the need to keep up with New York. The difference would not be nearly so great with out New York's excess.
Quite simply, the Yankees today are the epitome of everything wrong with baseball. As much as one hated them, one used to respect the Bombers of lore. Despise them, yes, but respect them. Respect is now out the window, replaced by even greater loathing.
As for Notre Dame, I don't care much either way. I do think their exclusive deal with NBC is somewhat ridiculous, especially in regards to their recent struggles, but those very struggles make me ambivalent towards them. I just returned to LA from a wedding in the Notre Dame Basilica. Whatever you can say about their football team, it's a beautiful campus and the Basilica absolutely gorgeous.
Gairzo
says:
April 30th, 2009 at 5:16 am
Your point is valid–about TW–not about me not doing my homework. I, in fact, always do my homework. My homework on this topic revealed several items:
Again, your point is legitimate, TW, at ND, did not play the "Booster" or public networking card as well as Davies or even Faust, and there may have been some "Deer in the headlight" syndrome going on as well. Those factors contributed to his dismissal, as well they should have.
The first thing a new college coach (and staff) should do is glad hand every booster and attend every high school and Pop Warner game they can, create a sense of genuine community and plant the seed in the regional players' minds that the coaches care and want local/regional kids to play for them. But, as Wilmner points out in the link I cited–proving I did do my homework–" the Irish said they were pleased with everything that happened from Sunday through Friday (ie: classroom, staying out of trouble), but the on-field results were not good enough."
That is a quote from Wilner's piece. But I remember the press conference and that is a very close paraphrase of what the ND head honcho said.
Maybe the Head Domer was blowin' smoke, I don't know. If he didn't have the integrity to say "Coach Willingham and us have differences of opinion about what the ancillary duties of our head coach should be; those differences are irreconcilable" that’s his mistake. Instead, the administration made a statement very close to the one I cited.
All I can do in my homework is get the facts straight.
Also,, Willingham, at the time of his Notre Dame hiring, was the hottest young coach in the country. His success at Stanford was not a mirage. I concede recruiting football players at Stanford is a different animal than at ND, but not as different as you might think.
The facts cited in my column are just that –FACTS. Notre Dame has a dismal record when it comes to interviewing and/or hiring minorities coaches in any sport. TW was the only head football coach in the last 70 years at ND not to be given a 5 year run. There was one other coach who was fired after four years.
'Nother thing my homework revealed: Notre Dame's dismissal of Willingham was, at first accelerated, then cemented only after Urban Meyer's agent made overtures about getting his "dream job" which turned out to be Florida because, I guess, they paid with dreamier money.
If as you say, TW is a bad coach, what does that make Weiss? The record says they are pretty much equal.
BTW, in 2003 Willingham had, according to scout .com, the 5th best recruiting class in the nation; ’02, the 13th. That he was a poor recruiter was a convenient excuse to can him when Urban Meyer decided to leave Utah.
The facts surrounding TW’s dismissal speak for themselves as does my column.
I don’t take one word of it back.
Bill Cruncher
says:
April 30th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Many are hesitant to criticize TW for fear of being labeled as racist. Tyrone was very good and using the race card to his advantage. he didn't necessarily do it, others did and he never shot it down. When he was about to be fired the year before, any idea why the NAACP called Washington officials requesting a meeting? Look to one of his former assistants who claimed racism when he got leap frogged at Colorado.
As a college football coach, pissing off the money is a death wish. Tyrone could care less. As terrible of a coach as Tyrone was, it was all the off field stuff that got him fired.
Tyrone could recruit if guys came to him. If he had to go out and actually recruit, forget it. Weiss may have the same record, but his recruiting has been much better. I'm not saying Weiss is great, but Tyrone was horrible
I tend to read more into what is not said at times. Trust me, most at Stanford were glad he left. Some were tired of him whining about not being able to get an NFL gig because he was black.
In the end, TW was a paycheck coach. He was more concerned about his reputation than anything else. Credit for everything, blame for nothing.
if you've never seen this, check it out. This is typical Tyrone. he was being asked about the status of a player who he suspended and never gave a reason why.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxUIczVCsnA
Not an isolated incident either. Typical Tyrone. Not sure what race has to do with being an ass, but this behavior got old at Stanford, ND, as well as Washington
M-Dog
says:
May 1st, 2009 at 2:24 pm
One thing your article failed to mention was……………..Rudy!!! What that man went through to be a champion can never be understated. When WE Get Em On The Run…..We Keep Em On The Run, and we're gonna Fight, Fight, Fight!!!! God Bless the Irish!!!!! except of course for the university's politics
Gairzo
says:
May 1st, 2009 at 11:30 pm
Ah, RUDY! Such a gay gay movie. I hope my gay friends forgive for the insult.
What would've made RUDY the perfect movie?
If he was having an affair with a priest or better yet if the demented Ghost of the Gipper took him on a magical tour of how much more of a winner Notre Dame if Rudy had never stepped on campus.
Of course, this leaves our hero depressed. He hangs himself off the goalpost crossbar.
…And in the background Touchdown Jesus can be seen throwing the finger…
Ned
says:
May 2nd, 2009 at 3:25 am
Just another pilot fish media member drafting off the Yanks and Irish. Who do you write about tomorrow, the Celtics and Canadians? Talk about mailing it in…
Gairzo
says:
May 2nd, 2009 at 4:08 am
Just another vapid poster incapable of adding to any worthy discussion; always willing to insult those who try to initiate one. What will you bitch about tomorrow? An article decrying steroids or calling for a college football play-off?You offered no insight, no counter argument, no refutation. Only a lame insult.Who mailed it in, pal? I bet you even forgot the stamp.
Gairzo
says:
May 2nd, 2009 at 4:34 am
Just another vapid poster incapable of adding to any worthy discussion; always willing to insult those who try to initiate one. What will you bitch about tomorrow? An An article decrying steroids or calling for a college football play-off?
You offered no insight, no counter argument, no refutation. Only a lame insult.
Who mailed it in, pal?
Bet you even forgot the stamp.
Nate Barlow
says:
May 3rd, 2009 at 1:15 am
Please tell me how Yankeenomics benefits baseball as a whole. Please. I'd love to hear it. If you're going to make such a comment, back it up. With anything. Even if it's based on completely fallacious reasoning, at least have something resembling an argument to justify it.
If we can't criticize teams and individuals when they are deserving, what's the point? Sacred cows deserve to be slaughtered. But everything needs rationalization.